(Side note: Who would want to be afraid of themselves? We're all awesome!)
Armed with this knowledge, this morning I would like to take the opportunity to engage in some light fear mongering of my own. Enjoy.
Armed with this knowledge, this morning I would like to take the opportunity to engage in some light fear mongering of my own. Enjoy.
Young adults 20-24 years old continue to hold an official unemployment rate around 15%.
85% of college students plan to move back in with their parents.
5 years ago (2006) that number was 65.
Just thought I'd throw that one out- my generation's gonna get the short end of the stick. This is just one way we're seeing it happen.
The government's official numbers put unemployment at a low-recession level of 9%. That sounds kinda scary. Almost 1 in 10 people in America is defined as 'looking for a job, haven't found one yet.'
9% is the product of one conservative measure of unemployment- those seeking work but not having a job. There are other groups that can be factored in. There are the "not employed, no longer seeking," for example, which the government no longer counts (but used to prior to 1994). There are the under-employed which are not counted. There are other groups I don't know about because I'm no economist- I don't even have a bachelor's. But I read what smart people think, so bear with me while I regurgitate.

The above graph is from Shadow Government Statistics, an alternative information analysis source. The above red line is the official unemployment rate, the number you would hear on CNN or Fox News. Officially unemployment nears 10% going into 2011. The grey line represents the 'broadest' official unemployment designation from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. It includes some of the 'short-term discouraged' non-working along with some of those underemployed forced to work part-time. That number stands at 17%. The Shadow Government Statistics blue line includes the huge number of 'long-term discouraged' non-workers. Their numbers for unemployment state that nearly 1 in 4 Americans do not have work. Depending on what groups you omit, your source for numbers of unemployed Americans as of December 2011 can tell you anywhere from 1 in 10 to 1 in 4.
That's worth noting.
(Life lesson here.)
Government entities can skew numbers in their favor.
Under- and unemployment lead me to our next subject- who's buying food for these people not making money?
Well, if you're making money, you're paying for your own food plus the 1 in 10/1 in 4 who aren't making money.
Well, if you're making money, you're paying for your own food plus the 1 in 10/1 in 4 who aren't making money.

I guess the idea of nearly 14% of Americans being on food stamps might not be that scary. It's just worth pointing out how many Americans depend on taxpayer dollars to get their food (a lot. And the number keeps growing). Those on food stamps receive a little under $200 a month for food. No, that's not a lot. And as I wrote yesterday, every dollar you own becomes worth less and less on a daily basis. Inflation sucks for your savings.

Again, the CPI is the government's inflation numbers (which is weighted towards housing and other big-ticket items) while the SGS alternate takes everyday items like food and gasoline much more evenly into account.
Just remember when looking at this chart: The Quantitative Easing II I wrote about yesterday was meant to combat deflation. Deflation would mean those little squiggly lines are dropping below 0% into negative territory (they're not). QE II (printing money) is an action that purposefully creates inflation (or in this case, simply aggravates it).
This is not cool if you make a fixed income or are dependent on savings. Not cool.
To run through some other bad things:
- Housing prices still falling. Home prices are another measure of people's "savings," and those savings have been literally erased out of existence as home prices have died.
-There's that peak oil thing I wrote about in my first post. The CEO of Shell recently predicted $5 a gallon gas by 2012. Meh.
-Civil rights are being eroded. The TSA wants to touch your junk. Yada yada yada.
-Bruce Willis can't really nuke Earth-bound asteroids. (WHAT?!?!?!?! THE HORROR!)
Yeah, enough of this. James Wesley Rawles of survivalblog.com put out his New Years 2011 outlook yesterday. Having given him credit, I'm simply going to share his insights now.
Insights of that survivalist guy I kinda don't agree with, but here I do:
And so on and so forth. Thank you Mr. Rawles.
There- For now, that's as close as I'm going to bother with laying out an "Economically, we're screwed" blog. Everything I just wrote simply provides a template to ask the bigger question:
What to do, what to do, what to do.
Seeing a larger act coming, what smaller part do we choose to play?
Mr. Rawles likes to believe in buying a mountain retreat 'bugging out' of society in the event of problems (actually, now that I think of it I believe he lives there anyway. He's got one). Many other people agree with him, and dream of para-military 1800s-esque isolationist existence while the 'sheeple' who looked down on it starve, rot, and are otherwise enslaved by the mutant zombie bikers who will rule the desert wastelands of America (because America will be a desert wasteland ruled by mutant zombie bikers).
Mr. Rawles likes to believe in buying a mountain retreat 'bugging out' of society in the event of problems (actually, now that I think of it I believe he lives there anyway. He's got one). Many other people agree with him, and dream of para-military 1800s-esque isolationist existence while the 'sheeple' who looked down on it starve, rot, and are otherwise enslaved by the mutant zombie bikers who will rule the desert wastelands of America (because America will be a desert wasteland ruled by mutant zombie bikers).
Now, I know it's a long leap of logic from the economics I've laid out to a desert wasteland America ruled by mutant zombie bikers. I think it is something of a leap even from a collapse of the dollar (system of finance) to a collapse of society (system of people) because I believe that community (system of people) is not built on the dollar alone. A lot of people (like Mr. Rawles) find it very easy to make that leap. I don't.
The end of the dollar is an improbable event. Improbable does not mean impossible. It is a black swan historical event; history is made by black swan historical events. But even black swan events are not necessarily apocalyptic events.
Societies survive currency collapse. Markets survive currency collapse. They change. Everything changes. Nothing is ever set. Those things that are set do break, but things that can change and bend do not break near so easily. And the only reason I'm writing this is because I am trying to see how things are changing.
Tomorrow will be a new year. I'll give the economics a break and write about cultural/societal change.
Hey. Hey you. Reading this. There's a comment box. Right under this. You should, you know, write in it. Share your thoughts. Say what ya think. Say what ya don't think. Ya know?
Yeah.

Over 10 years, the gold price has gone up more than 500%. The big question: is gold in a bubble? Is $1,400 the top for gold prices?